|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What comes aroundAuthor: Tim Footman
June 11, 2010 @ 7:52 am
Following on from Chris Weingarten’s speech berating music blogs for wiping out good, honest journalism, here’s Something Awful suggesting that the reason blogs were able to push forward was because the music journalism in old media (such as Rolling Stone) was very often bloody awful. But any old-school inky-fingered hacks should take some comfort from the notion that blogs in turn will get theirs:
The greatest gig you never sawAuthor: Tim Footman
June 8, 2010 @ 12:01 pm
Prepare to have rock history rewritten. Forget the Beatles in Hamburg or Otis at Monterey or the Pistols at the 100 Club or Radiohead at Glastonbury. This is the one I would have wanted to be at. The Bay City Rollers, Ann-Margret and the wildest, most strung-out fans you’ve ever seen. You’ll almost drop your knitting. Hit it, Derek. “Good writing dies at the hands of Search Engine Optimisation”Author: Tim Footman
April 22, 2010 @ 1:49 pm
If you haven’t heard Chris Weingarten’s speech on the way music journalism is being squashed by maths, it’s well worth a listen. Warning: lots of swears, and a horrid hat. Thanks to Everett True for the link. The never-ending story of Leonard CohenAuthor: Tim Footman
October 23, 2009 @ 11:47 pm
I’ve long been a defender of books. Good, honest, inky, papery, analogue books, with words that don’t change colour even if you point at them. Kindles? Pah! They don’t smell of anything, and you can’t fold the corners over. And yet… and yet. Earlier this year, I wrote a biography of the strange, funny, old, Canadian, Jewish, randy, short, hat-wearing singer-songwriter Leonard Cohen. In August, it went to the printers. And now it’s back from the printers, and it’s in shops, in piles that make me go a bit swoony when I see them. The only problem is that between printing and publication, a number of things happened that by all rights ought to have been in the book:
Now, if the biography had been available in an electronic form, I could have slotted all these nuggets in with minimal fuss, right up to the point of distribution. In fact, surely it would be quite feasible for purchasers to subscribe to some sort of infinite update, whereby any news stories pertaining to Mr Cohen could be seamlessly integrated, so that my book became a permanently evolving text, as constantly surprising as Leonard himself. But isn’t there something to be said for a book (or a record, or a film, or whatever) existing as a definitive, discrete document? There it is: no extra nuggets; no previously unreleased tracks; no CGI Jabba the Hutt. It can be wrong; it can be misconceived; it can be out of date. But it still is. Deal with it. Otherwise you’ve just got Wikipedia. That said, I’m still pissed off that I missed out David Gest. Woo! Hello, Düsseldorf!Author: Tim Footman
July 16, 2009 @ 4:25 am
How many songs are there where the definitive version is the live recording, rather than the studio take that (presumably) preceded it? ‘Definitive’ is of course debatable, so let’s say “the version that would probably get played if the song were to get chosen for The Chain on Radcliffe & Maconie’s evening show on Radio 2″. A few obvious ones off the top: Talking Heads, ‘Psycho Killer’, Stop Making Sense over ’77. Bob Marley & the Wailers, ‘No Woman No Cry’, Live! over Natty Dread. Otis Redding, ‘I’ve Been Loving You Too Long’, Monterey over Otis Blue. U2, ‘New Year’s Day’, Red Rocks over War. Any more? Power BallardAuthor: Tim Footman
April 19, 2009 @ 11:49 pm
I think the death of JG Ballard deserves marking here because although he never (to my knowledge) smashed a guitar or threw a groupie out of a hotel window, his transgressive erudition was far more rock ‘n’ roll than that displayed by any number of posturing putative punks a third of his age. I offer you the thought of my virtual friend Ben (a pretty Ballardian concept in itself), who tweets as amuchmoreexotic:
On remembering buying the Dandy from a woman who looked a bit like Roger WatersAuthor: Tim Footman
April 14, 2009 @ 2:18 pm
I’m currently working on a book project involving late-blooming karaoke icon Len Cohen. Immersing oneself in the minutiae of anybody’s life always gives rise to odd emotional reactions; this is especially tough, not least because from certain angles Cohen looks more than a little like one of my former headmasters (and not just because they’re both Canadians of Eastern European heritage, and roughly the same age). So… Have you ever had difficulty engaging with the work of a cultural figure because of his/her passing resemblance to an authority figure from your formative years? Did your dentist look like Florence Ballard, or your school caretaker like PJ Proby? Was your pre-teen shoplifting curtailed by a Woolworths security guard who was the spitting image of Ian Paice out of Deep Purple? Do tell. It’s cheaper than therapy. The lost art of the analogue sampleAuthor: Tim Footman
March 27, 2009 @ 10:23 am
There is a long an honourable tradition of songwriters copying each other’s work. Elderly bluesmen had their back catalogues rifled by Elvis, the Stones and Led Zeppelin; James Brown was the unwitting co-author of numerous hip-hop anthems; and Noel Gallagher dared to rip off the Rutles. But there’s another kind of copying; a wry nod, a few words or notes that pay tribute with a smile. A familiar riff would come out of nowhere, and be gone almost before you’d noticed it. It was so blatant, only the most tight-assed copyright lawyer could complain. For some reason, these were particularly big in the late 1960s/early 1970s, examples being: The Small Faces, ‘Lazy Sunday‘: comb-and-paper snatch of the Stones’ ‘Satisfaction’. David Bowie, ‘The Laughing Gnome‘: the gnome asks “Have yew got a loight boy?” in emulation of the wonderful Singing Postman, Allen Smethurst. The Beatles, ‘It’s All Too Much‘, from Yellow Submarine: while Ringo invents the Madchester drum sound 20 years before the fact, George gives us a brief snippet of ‘Sorrow’, by the Merseys. Roxy Music, ‘Re-make, Re-model‘: Graham Simpson’s bass solo is copped from the Beatles’ ‘Day Tripper’. Any more? Stage frightsAuthor: Tim Footman
March 18, 2009 @ 2:02 am
All music fans have a list of acts that they wish they’d seen in their pomp: for me, it’s Otis Redding, Syd-era Floyd and the Smiths. But what about the bands you love, but know were abysmal as a live proposition? For me, it’s the Velvet Underground: as a teenager, I was obsessed with their looks, their attitude and their sound. White Light/White Heat remains my favourite album ever, and I still contend that they are the most influential American rock band of all time, albeit with the Beach Boys and the Ramones snapping at their heels. But on the available evidence (Max’s Kansas City, 1969, MCMXCIII, the Quine Tapes and various bits and pieces on box sets and bootlegs) they were pretty hopeless live. The simmering tension and rivalry between Lou Reed and John Cale, then Reed and Doug Yule, that made for such a delicious dialectic in the studio, translates as incoherence on stage. Reed’s nonchalance becomes petulance; the brutal simplicity of Moe Tucker’s drumming is just an annoying thumping sound. (And the stuff without Moe is by definition VU-lite anyway – Loaded has always been my least favourite studio album.) So, over to you: an act you adore, but that you’re glad you never paid cash to see; or you’re sorry that you did. Postmodern Futurism: Pop Gets Up ItselfAuthor: Tim Footman
March 14, 2009 @ 6:59 am
The acquisition of a second-hand paperback by the much-missed Dr Magnus Pyke recently prompted a post on my own blog, Cultural Snow, and an inevitable YouTube trawl for that Thomas Dolby track. Which, in the way these things happen, led to a trek back to a virtual yesterday where pop music seemed to the preserve of drama students pretending to be mad scientists, or maybe vice versa. It may be tiresomely academic to impose a retrospective genre on some of these records, but here goes: let’s call it Postmodern Futurism. The artists combined the arch self-awareness of Baudrillard with the fascination for technological progress expressed by Marinetti. Careful readers will have spotted a degree of ideological crossover with the mini-manifestos that Paul Morley developed for the ZTT label (which of course took its name from Marinetti’s writings) but much of ZTT’s product is too glossy to fit, with the honourable exception of the Art of Noise. So what are we looking for? A raised eyebrow, certainly; but also a delight in the mechanics of pop; think of it as music that doesn’t mind having its wires exposed, its working in full view. Or, indeed, a step on from Barney’s post about meta-songs; just as those works contemplated the craft of songwriting, PMF at once interrogates and embodies the whole process of pop. It’s about the transmission and reception of music, the cultural and economic circumstances in which it exists; but above all the technology that makes it possible, and by extension all technology. It started somewhere on the astral flightpath between Lee Perry and Kraftwerk, although one could make a persuasive case for seeing conceptual foreshadowings in The Who Sell Out (1967); had its annus mirabilis in 1979; and only really began sputtering to a halt when confronted with the roll-up-your-jacket-sleeves earnestness of Live Aid, although there were still suggestions of it in some of the kitchen-sink sample fests released later in the decade. (Of course, hip-hop artists were pioneers in the use of samples, but hip-hop, with a few exceptions such as Steinski and Coldcut, has always been better at talking about its own mythology than its own mechanics.) The KLF started from the same aesthetic, but then took it to the logical extreme, progressing from deconstruction to demolition. Whereas Buggles or M celebrated pop, albeit between inverted commas, Cauty and Drummond decided that in order to save pop, it was necessary to destroy it. Fatboy Slim and the Skint stable offered faint echoes of the genre in the 1990s, as did acts such as Daft Punk and Air, but the increased sophistication in sampling technology means that these days, you can’t see the wires – which removes the whole raison d’être of PMF. Mash-ups such as Kylie’s ‘Can’t Get Blue Monday Out Of My Head’ (or, on a larger scale, Danger Mouse’s The Grey Album) demonstrate that two classic pop songs can be fused together to pleasing, often amusing effect, but don’t tell us anything else. Anyway, this is the sort of stuff I’m talking about:
Feel free to add – or, if you aspire to inhabit Professor Dolby’s Home for Deranged Scientists, invent – your own. PS: Moderately relevant interview with Karl Bartos at Quietus. |
Recent posts
Authors
Subscribe
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Library
|
Subscribe | Free on RBP | Get Newsletter | Audio
|
Contact
|
Writers
| Writers' Blogs
Content Services | Magazine Archive | About Us | Press Room | Your Account | Home |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||