9/6/12: Some Thoughts as Madonna’s “ MDNA” Tour hits North America
By Carol Cooper
As I write this Thursday night I can hear Madonna singing from Yankee Stadium through the window of my Harlem apartment. In fact, the sound mix on “Girls Gone Wild” and “Papa Don’t Preach” gets so good that her vocals cut like a Samurai sword across a perfectly balanced backing track and the audible appreciation of the crowd. The concert seemed to start just as Vice President Biden ended his televised speech at the Democratic National Convention. I, of course, saw the smaller, arena-sized production of this spectacle in Philly last week, which kicked off the North American leg of her MDNA tour. But we early birds were warned that unless we saw the stadium show we weren’t seeing Madonna’s definitive version of this show.
Be that as it may, Philly inspired me to contemplate the live performance Madonna put together for her fans this year,and nothing could be more inspiring as I share these thoughts than hearing her rock Yankee Stadium from a few blocks away.
MDNA…but for one letter, alludes to Ecstasy. But like the dance party drug, Madonna promises no unalloyed pleasures. Even as early as her *Blonde Ambition* tour Madonna was performing more to prove thematic points than to entertain. Unlike lesser pop stars who also think their songwriting is strong enough to support artistic, “attitudinal” staging, only Madonna sustains the palpable strength of character to pair the blood-splatter visuals of *Dexter* to a homicidal songabout her ex-husband and somehow make it a gleeful collective catharsis.
Shifting from girl backup dancers to male dancers from song to song also creates interesting juxtapositions you wouldn’t see from, say, Katy Perry, Gaga, or Taylor Swift. To begin with, it’s her manly queens that get to strut and ki-ki through “Girls Gone Wild”, while her guerilla girls butch it up and flash rifles through “Revolver”. A raw, defiant Nikki Minaj appears via video like Madge’s adolescent alter-ego to bring ghetto realness to the coda of “I Don’t Give a***.” And it was Nikki’s chirpy yelps which gave generational balance to the magnificent gospel singer who contributes a solo near the end of the show during *Like A Prayer.* Madonna actually *genuflects* onstage to this diva’s wail, much as she visibly salutes the talents of the many side-performers she borrows from diverse traditions—Basque/Indian/Hip-Hop/drag balls—who help Madonna push the envelope of the acceptable sound of contemporary dance pop.
There are periodic momentum problems within the live show because Madonna refuses to program all the uptempo tracks into a seamless attempt to peak the crowd then keep them in a kinetic frenzy like a deejay would. Instead she will slow things down for elegiac meditations on relationships: like “Best Friend” or the Golden Globe-winning“Masterpiece”. That she leads into the latter with a languid “Open Your Heart” transformed by the Bollywood sway of Kalakan’s “Sagara Jo” lets the mod-era lilt of “Masterpiece” allude both to the inspirational diversity of the Beatles and to the imperialistic history of the land which gave her a British ex- husband.
Speaking to the risky sacrament of marriage, the church backdrops featured throughout this show repeatedly shatter or dissolve via projected images which telegraph all five “stages” of the MDNA experience (ranging from”Transgression” to “Celebration”) and underscore the jittery momentum of the pacing. Opening in a shadowy gothic cathedral with buff monks ringing a bell, the set shifts to reveal a open chapel showing stained-glass windows streaming with sunlight and grace.
This is the Church of Love, in which Lady Madonna has worshipped long enough to sacrifice two marriages on its altar. Accordingly, twice we see projected images of the church shatter or dissolve on screens above the stage. Sometimes the bricks explode into literal visions of heaven and hell; another time into Christ’s heart wreathed in thorns. Madonna didn’t enter either of her marriages lightly. She held as an article of faith that she could (and should) be able to make a marriage of creative equals work. She was betrayed in that belief, and a large part of MDNA’s drama reflects wryly on the ramifications of that betrayal.
That’s why her live mash-up of “Express Yourself” with “Born this Way” resonates as much more than snarky commentary on Lady Gaga. First, let’s give Gaga a break here shall we? Until Gaga puts out four or five more hit solo albums, there’s no way her slender output as a singer/songwriter can be measured against Madonna’s track record. So if it’s not all about Gaga what is it about? It’s about what the *lyrics* are saying. “Express Yourself” talks about a talented woman respecting herself enough to want a creative/intellectual equal for a spouse then doing everything possible not to settle for less. “(I Was) Born This Way” is about that same woman refusing to apologize for her aggressive drive and dominant personality. The repeated ad-lib “She’s not me!” in this context reads like disappointment, not outrage. It’s the mordant battle cry of every career girl who has survived watching men leave them for less “difficult”, less ambitious women. To pull her head out of these sobering epiphanies with the sassy marching band swagger of “Give Me All Your Luvin’ ” proves that our Madge knows how to bounce back. Gladly trading the faithless love of a husband for the admiration of millions, Madonna, now in her fifties, returns to the arms of her muse and gently maturing fandom.
Far more important than musical asides about men or momentary rivals are the sly in-jokes Madonna will sometimes deploy to amuse herself. (Remember that equestrian montage she did around the time a male bestiality ring went public?) “Justify My Love”, a provocative tone-poem which dates from the time of her *Sex* book, introduces a suite of libidinal material which functions here as a John Waters-esque retort to any critic who ever wanted to reduce Madonna’s girlie show allusions to mere prurience. The rapid segue into the stylistic diversity of “Vogue,” “CandyShop,” and “Human Nature” lets Madonna and her dancers work the proscenium in a parade of all the edgy fashions she introduced to MTV. The costumes culminate in her stripping to her underwear to give us Dietrich at the Blue Angel crooning a waltz-time piano remix of “Like A Virgin.” Then she goes Miles Davis one better by turning not only her back to her audience, but also a nearly bare ass.
This dramatic stroll down memory lane could be seen as a beautiful mess by those who are too linear and literal in their thinking. To be sure there is a certain amount of chaos throughout the MDNA carnival . But it is controlled chaos with a creative purpose. There is a quote from the arts criticism of C.G. Jung that illustrates this point. It reveals Jung’s reaction to the “diabolical” literary style James Joyce applied to his experimental novel *Ulysses*. By replacing every reference to Joyce with a reference to Madonna and replacing the word *Ulysses* with *MDNA,* a marvelously Jungian view of this tour emerges below:
“Under the cynicism of Madonna there is hidden a great compassion. Madonna knows the suffering of a world that is neither beautiful nor good, and worse still, rolls on without hope through the eternally repeated everyday…dragging with it man’s consciousness in an idiot dance through the hours,months, years. With MDNA she has dared to take the step that leads to the detachment of consciousness from the object. She has freed herself from attachment, entanglement and delusion, and can therefore turn homeward. MDNA gives us more than a subjective expression of personal opinion, for the creative genius is never one but many, and MDNA speaks in stillness to the souls of the multitude, whose meaning and destiny it embodies no less than the artist’s own.”
– ’Ullysses’: A Monologue (1932/1934) from *The Spirit in Man, Art, andLiterature*
5 Responses to Thoughts On Madonna’s MDNA Tour in America
Huh. Sounds like you count yourself amongst her HUNDREDS-OF-THOUSANDS of so-called “fans”. Madonna has been irrelevant for AT LEAST the last five years. So much so that I had no idea she even had a new album out, let alone was actually touring behind said album.
Also, there was a reason they were pitching you her “stadium” shows like crappy timeshares – ONLY TWO-THIRDS, if that, of any stadium is being used, so it’s not anything like U2′s 360 tour, or any of Springsteen’s tours. Now those guys USE stadiums.
Madonna is completely and abjectly irrelevant and it’s my fervent hope that she stops any further embarrasment and not only stops her frightening attempts at being a “hot” cougar/milf, but just plains stops period: making albums, doing more books of herself nude (talk about abject narcissisim) and stops these lame attempts at keeping herself in the limelight with her uber-been-there, done-that tours.
YAWN…Next!!!
…………….zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
You have every right to your opinion. But so do those ticket buyers who made Madonna the first solo female artist EVER to headline Yankee Stadium. I am always glad to hear opinions different from mine. But I have to wonder when you reference U2 and Springsteen if you might not be harboring a Rockist bias against not only dance pop, but especially female pop stars? If so, you are not the only one. But then I wouldn’t expect you to even attempt to understand Madonna’s aesthetic if you adhere to a militant “rock über alles” point of view.
Wow, this guy’s learned a lot from the rock ‘n’ roll wars of the last 50 years. NRA misogyny – just what we need on Rock’s Backpages.
Weapons-grade odious drivel. Why don’t you take your vile prejudices somewhere else?
It’s amazing what Madonna fans can “Justify” with complicated language and wishful thinking.
The woman can’t sing (she practically wore out the pitch corrector when she recorded the “Evita” soundtrack, and was horrendous on the Academy Awards broadcast years ago).
She’s only learned to dance in the last couple of years, and actually, the backup dancers do most of the work.
She positioned herself as a sex object since the very beginning and slept her way up the career ladder (says someone who worked behind the scenes for a long time).
She’s the complete opposite of a feminist (says a woman who has been one most of her life), regularly combines sex-and-violence imagery, rides trends everyone else started, and stated her shtick pretty loudly up front: Material Girl.
Remember those lyrics? A female who wants things from a man, in exchange for her, uh, attentions? What’s that called again? Begins with a p…
A strong woman who wants a man who’s an equal? Gimme a friggin’ break! She uses them for what she can get, then makes her next career move: Jellybean Benitez to get her records played in clubs, Sean Penn to get into acting, Warren Beatty for movie business clout, and the last one, a director– need I go on?
She’s working the same old side of the street as the “girls” on 11th Avenue, just for a higher price. She’s possibly the most egocentric “entertainer” around. As for being the only female able to fill Yankee Stadium, uh– Tina Turner filled a much larger stadium, in Brazil. There’s even a video of it. Go look it up.
I am sick to death of my own gender buying the pretzel logic that says Madonna represents sexual liberation, and sick of them idolizing this crass, greedy woman. No one with self-respect sells her body parts. That’s not sexual liberation, it’s sexual exploitation– and the fact that she voluntarily does it makes it even worse! (This is the part where all the hoodwinked women—who probably think a pole dancing class is so fun—yell that “she’s in control of her own image! her own career!”)
Let me spell out some analogies:
–It used to be “improper” for women to smoke. Men smoked. The tobacco companies saw a market. They made a (skinny) cigarette for women and said, “You’ve come a long way, baby!” Yeah– toward equal lung cancer.
–Movies and TV shows are full of male characters carrying guns and killing people. A lot of people complained that there weren’t enough female characters in movies and on TV who weren’t housewives or dead hookers. Media moguls saw a niche. So now lots of women in movies and on TV carry guns and kill people. Equal violence– sure, that’s what feminism means.
Get it?
Madonna’s the epitome of the woman who degrades all of us. Women who have self-esteem and can REALLY sing, dance, write songs, and act don’t need to rely on porn clichés. Cyndi Lauper, for one. (Oh, and guess whose costuming Madonna ripped off for her first incarnation?)
Comparing Madonna to James Joyce? What are you, on drugs?? Have you actually READ James Joyce?
I can understand some straight men thinking Madonna’s cool or hot or whatever, because she’s got a killer bod (several hours a day with a personal trainer and a plastic surgery budget does that for ya), but that’s just one piece of their anatomy talking. It’s refreshing to hear that at least one man sees through her. Usually it’s me yelling, “The Emperor has no clothes!” (ha ha)
Madonna was irrelevant from the very beginning, and always will be. She’s not about music, she’s about marketing. Plastic through and through. This isn’t about being “rockist.” It’s about QUALITY. I’m not a country music fan, but I know who the quality singers are. I’m not an opera fan, but I know who the quality artists are.
Madonna’s about the bedroom, Martha Stewart’s about the kitchen. That’s where women have always been told we should be, and now we have women putting out the same story. We have NOT come a long way, baby, until T&A is no longer the popular currency. No matter how much you gussy up your rhetoric, the reality is: Madonna is the product of sexism. She just put her own price tag on it.