<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salinger and Lennon: A fatal distraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rocksbackpagesblogs.com/2010/01/salinger-and-lennon-a-fatal-distraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rocksbackpagesblogs.com/2010/01/salinger-and-lennon-a-fatal-distraction/</link>
	<description>Rock reviews, rock articles &#38; rock interviews from the Ultimate Rock&#039;n&#039;Roll Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:35:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock's Backpages: Writers Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.rocksbackpagesblogs.com/2010/01/salinger-and-lennon-a-fatal-distraction/#comment-8388</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock's Backpages: Writers Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocksbackpagesblogs.com/2010/01/salinger-and-lennon-a-fatal-distraction/#comment-8388</guid>
		<description>[...] Salinger and Lennon: A Fatal DistractionPosted by Simon Warneron Rock&#8217;s Back Pages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Salinger and Lennon: A Fatal DistractionPosted by Simon Warneron Rock&#8217;s Back Pages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Warner</title>
		<link>http://www.rocksbackpagesblogs.com/2010/01/salinger-and-lennon-a-fatal-distraction/#comment-6123</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocksbackpagesblogs.com/2010/01/salinger-and-lennon-a-fatal-distraction/#comment-6123</guid>
		<description>As ever, Richard, thanks for your interesting retort. Didn&#039;t realise that JDS was influenced by the New Criticism in that way. When we think of the Beats and their confessional engagement - often beyond the pages of books: on stages, on TV, on demos, particularly Ginsberg but also McClure, Ferlinghetti and others - that&#039;s find I find the closed-door approach so disconcerting.

But yr comments on Chapman, on Manson, on Reagan, do put my feelings - personal feelings which I confessed in the blog were of the gut rather than cerebral ones - in a wider context. Thank you for sharing those thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As ever, Richard, thanks for your interesting retort. Didn&#8217;t realise that JDS was influenced by the New Criticism in that way. When we think of the Beats and their confessional engagement &#8211; often beyond the pages of books: on stages, on TV, on demos, particularly Ginsberg but also McClure, Ferlinghetti and others &#8211; that&#8217;s find I find the closed-door approach so disconcerting.</p>
<p>But yr comments on Chapman, on Manson, on Reagan, do put my feelings &#8211; personal feelings which I confessed in the blog were of the gut rather than cerebral ones &#8211; in a wider context. Thank you for sharing those thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Riegel</title>
		<link>http://www.rocksbackpagesblogs.com/2010/01/salinger-and-lennon-a-fatal-distraction/#comment-6121</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Riegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rocksbackpagesblogs.com/2010/01/salinger-and-lennon-a-fatal-distraction/#comment-6121</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, Simon, I tend to agree with Andrew (commenter on your personal blog) that Mark Chapman&#039;s deranged desire to kill John Lennon likely wouldn&#039;t have been mollified by a more openly expressive J.D. Salinger.  Chapman had long since imagined what he wanted about &quot;The Catcher in the Rye&quot; to justify his murderous intention, which seemed to date back to Lennon&#039;s Beatles-are-more-popular-than-Jesus remark in 1966.  

A Beatles-related parallel can actually be found in Charles Manson&#039;s claim that their White Album, specifically the song &quot;Helter Skelter,&quot; contained coded instructions to instigate the race war he lusted to start. I don&#039;t know how anyone could deduce that message from the White Album myself, even playing it backwards on acid, but Manson did, because he WANTED that &quot;justification&quot; to be there for his lunatic fantasies. If the White Album hadn&#039;t come out right at that time, Manson likely would have found the same message in some other equally-innocent source.  

It&#039;s hard for me to imagine J.D. Salinger cooperating in explicating his books, no matter the circumstances, as I recall him as pretty close-mouthed even before went into seclusion and stopped publishing back in the 1960&#039;s. He came from that generation of writers who grew up with the idea (nurtured by the &quot;New Critics&quot; of the time) that their books should speak entirely for themselves, without any provision of the author&#039;s own human background. I still recall how radical it seemed to read Norman Mailer&#039;s first-person confessions in those same 1960&#039;s, as he would admit to lust for success, his competition with fellow writers, and other such solipsisms heretofore considered beneath the dignity of &quot;serious&quot; novelists.   

I share your outrage over Chapman&#039;s murder of Lennon, Simon, and in my own irrational way, I&#039;ve always tended to connect 3rd-party blame to Ronald Reagan rather than J.D. Salinger -- Reagan was elected president just a month before the killing, and then a whole string of tragedies that directly affected my life occurred early on his watch: Creem publisher Barry Kramer died in 1981, Lester Bangs died in 1982, both of my parents were diagnosed with fatal diseases, etc., etc.. I can&#039;t link Reagan to any of those events, of course, but they just seemed of a piece with the poisonous zeitgeist he released into Amerika then. And John Lennon&#039;s murder was the first tragedy in that chain. I&#039;m with Yoko Ono when Chapman comes up for parole again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, Simon, I tend to agree with Andrew (commenter on your personal blog) that Mark Chapman&#8217;s deranged desire to kill John Lennon likely wouldn&#8217;t have been mollified by a more openly expressive J.D. Salinger.  Chapman had long since imagined what he wanted about &#8220;The Catcher in the Rye&#8221; to justify his murderous intention, which seemed to date back to Lennon&#8217;s Beatles-are-more-popular-than-Jesus remark in 1966.  </p>
<p>A Beatles-related parallel can actually be found in Charles Manson&#8217;s claim that their White Album, specifically the song &#8220;Helter Skelter,&#8221; contained coded instructions to instigate the race war he lusted to start. I don&#8217;t know how anyone could deduce that message from the White Album myself, even playing it backwards on acid, but Manson did, because he WANTED that &#8220;justification&#8221; to be there for his lunatic fantasies. If the White Album hadn&#8217;t come out right at that time, Manson likely would have found the same message in some other equally-innocent source.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard for me to imagine J.D. Salinger cooperating in explicating his books, no matter the circumstances, as I recall him as pretty close-mouthed even before went into seclusion and stopped publishing back in the 1960&#8242;s. He came from that generation of writers who grew up with the idea (nurtured by the &#8220;New Critics&#8221; of the time) that their books should speak entirely for themselves, without any provision of the author&#8217;s own human background. I still recall how radical it seemed to read Norman Mailer&#8217;s first-person confessions in those same 1960&#8242;s, as he would admit to lust for success, his competition with fellow writers, and other such solipsisms heretofore considered beneath the dignity of &#8220;serious&#8221; novelists.   </p>
<p>I share your outrage over Chapman&#8217;s murder of Lennon, Simon, and in my own irrational way, I&#8217;ve always tended to connect 3rd-party blame to Ronald Reagan rather than J.D. Salinger &#8212; Reagan was elected president just a month before the killing, and then a whole string of tragedies that directly affected my life occurred early on his watch: Creem publisher Barry Kramer died in 1981, Lester Bangs died in 1982, both of my parents were diagnosed with fatal diseases, etc., etc.. I can&#8217;t link Reagan to any of those events, of course, but they just seemed of a piece with the poisonous zeitgeist he released into Amerika then. And John Lennon&#8217;s murder was the first tragedy in that chain. I&#8217;m with Yoko Ono when Chapman comes up for parole again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

